Like I said, I'll have a final decision tonight.
I strongly feel that this should be a group decision. There has not been much need in the past for voting, but if this isn't the kind of issue that calls for it, I don't know what is.
I feel that a fundamental issue about the league is at issue here: is this your league, or is it all of our league? By making the decision yourself, you are choosing the former. I believe this is not in the spirit of the league.
No one can argue that you have invested the most in the league, that is clear. However, the rest of us have invested a substantial amount of time in this league, and when we elected you as commissioner, we felt you would represent our interests in the league as well as your own.
If people believe you are cheating, even after you have expressed your desire to trash your team, let them vote for your proposal. No one is asking for an open vote. Those who vote for the proposal would be protected. Even those who vote for the proposal for their own personal gain and not the reasons you have given for the decision will be included.
I think that you will find that the overwhelming majority will vote against the proposal. I would even submit that we would need a 2/3 majority to defeat your proposal.
If the proposal is voted down, you will know that you have the support of the league.
I have not felt the need to challenge any of your decisions in the past. But when my own conception (and many others' conception) of the league conflicts so greatly with your own, I feel I must voice my opinion.
Can I go so far as to call it my 'duty' as co-commissioner? Maybe I'm taking this too seriously.