SSBA
December 29, 2024, 04:42:43 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Mihm or Dalembert  (Read 7294 times)
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
NetsGM
Administrator
GM
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6855



View Profile WWW Email
« on: July 20, 2005, 11:35:42 AM »

Who would you rather have?
Logged

aka dabods/dbodner
dbodner@phillyarena.net
RaptorsGM
GMs
GM
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5673


htotheizzo_17@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2005, 11:39:39 AM »

RROFL

I love it.
Logged

Full Rebuild Mode In Progress!
RaptorsGM
GMs
GM
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5673


htotheizzo_17@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2005, 11:41:51 AM »

Chris Mihm 7'0'' 265

13.4ppg, 11.6rpg, 3.1apg, 2.5bpg, .471 FG, .750 FT

 C+ C- D A- A- C

Team Record: 8-0

Samuel Dalembert 6'11'' 250

8.9ppg, 12.3ppg, 1.7apg, 3.0bpg, .565 FG, .556 FT

C+ D+ D A+ A- C

Team Record: 4-3
Logged

Full Rebuild Mode In Progress!
NetsGM
Administrator
GM
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6855



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2005, 11:48:11 AM »

I moved this because I didn't want it to dominate the game thread.

BTW, one thing to keep in mind with mihm's "superior" offensive ability is his career 41% fg percentage, which is puke inducing.  I don't think Mihm's increased career 3% ft% makes up for that.
Logged

aka dabods/dbodner
dbodner@phillyarena.net
KingsGM-old
old-gm's
GM
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3817


Jebacu vam majku ak mi ne donesete naslov

ZLOVRO
View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2005, 12:15:32 PM »

Thread is  Rolling Eyes ...but anyway. Well, they're basically the same players and i would take Sammy, but only cause of age.
Logged

The Great ZLOVRO And The Local Whores:

Sleepy Floyd
Byron Scott
Andrew Toney
Orlando Woolridge
Tom Chambers
Thurl Bailey
Joe Carrol
Benoit Benjamin

"We don't defend, aren't great in scoring but boy can we turn over the ball"
PacersGM
Guest
« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2005, 01:59:26 PM »

my vote is for sammy because he proved he is one of the best defenders in the game even without emeka and at both positions. with boozer mihm was always in trouble at C.
Logged
RaptorsGM
GMs
GM
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5673


htotheizzo_17@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: July 20, 2005, 02:28:46 PM »

Quote from: PacersGM
my vote is for sammy because he proved he is one of the best defenders in the game even without emeka and at both positions. with boozer mihm was always in trouble at C.




mihm doesn't play C anymore soo....
Logged

Full Rebuild Mode In Progress!
OldNuggetsGM
old-gm's
Coach
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 446



View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: July 20, 2005, 02:39:08 PM »

I was actually surprised that Mihm is so close to Sammy.  But obviously, you want the one who, IMO, has the most impact.  Sammy, like Camby, can anchor an entire D.  Sure, he's not great on offense, but Mihm isn't as dominating defensively as Sammy is.  For that alone, Sammy gets the nod.
Logged
RaptorsGM
GMs
GM
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5673


htotheizzo_17@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: July 20, 2005, 02:51:30 PM »

I think that, basically, Mihm is a better fit for my team, while Sammy is a better fit for the Nets team.

My team - we hold you to a realitivly low number of points, and score a ton.

The nets - the just try to hold you to a very, very low number.

I don't need a A+ defender at PF. That would be just overkill.
Logged

Full Rebuild Mode In Progress!
NetsGM
Administrator
GM
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6855



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #9 on: July 20, 2005, 02:55:58 PM »

Quote
The nets - the just try to hold you to a very, very low number.


As evidenced by my fast pace....

Just wait.  I'll be top 5 offensively this year.
Logged

aka dabods/dbodner
dbodner@phillyarena.net
RaptorsGM
GMs
GM
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5673


htotheizzo_17@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: July 20, 2005, 02:59:18 PM »

Quote from: NetsGM
Quote
The nets - the just try to hold you to a very, very low number.


As evidenced by my fast pace....

Just wait.  I'll be top 5 offensively this year.


Well, I was going more as evidenced by your 91 points per game, 3rd LAST in the League.

 Rolling Eyes
Logged

Full Rebuild Mode In Progress!
NetsGM
Administrator
GM
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6855



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #11 on: July 20, 2005, 03:00:20 PM »

Yeah, over 7 games.  7 of which were on the road.

Obviously, these #'s are entirely relevant.
Logged

aka dabods/dbodner
dbodner@phillyarena.net
RaptorsGM
GMs
GM
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5673


htotheizzo_17@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: July 20, 2005, 03:04:38 PM »

7 games is 8.5% of the season.

Plus, it's all we have to go by right now.

And who cares if it's on the road? I score 111 points per game on the road. With a Normal pace.
Logged

Full Rebuild Mode In Progress!
GoldenStateGM
GMs
GM
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2626


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: July 20, 2005, 03:05:14 PM »

The Mavs have historically been one of the higher scoring teams in the league, particularly when they had Araujo.  and yet they always played at a slow or very slow pace.
Heck, last year, when I moved my team to a higher pace, I scored about 5 less points per game.
Sompace does not necessarily increase your scoring.   You need the right personnel (Vince Carter seems to thrive in a fast pace)
Logged


The 2026 Golden State Warriors
The Youth Movement
C: Patrick O'Bryant - The Giant Irishman
PF : Shawn Kemp - Rebounding beast
SF : Michael Beasley - Rehab? Really?
SG : Batum or Rush - Who sucks less?
PG : Russel Westbrook - Combo guard or PG?
Pacific Division Leader : 2011, 2012, 2013, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2025, 2029
Western Conference Leader : 2011, 2012, 2013, 2020, 2022, 2029
Your Golden State Warriors, the 2013 SSBA Champions
NetsGM
Administrator
GM
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6855



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #14 on: July 20, 2005, 03:07:15 PM »

Pace most definitely does increase your fga's.

unless of course you have it increase your turnovers.

I have the spreadsheets to back this up.

Raptors: it may be all we have to go on, that doesn't mean it's valid.

If you think I am going to score 91 ppg, shoot the %'s I shot, and turn it over 18+ times/game, you're crazy.
Logged

aka dabods/dbodner
dbodner@phillyarena.net
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!