|
HawksGM
|
 |
« on: July 05, 2005, 09:51:56 AM » |
|
Hawks Trade:
Sonics 2008 1st (#8 )
Hawks 2009 1st
Hornets Trade:
Suns 2008 1st (#5)
Hawks agree
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
HornetsGM
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2005, 09:53:11 AM » |
|
agree
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
HornetsGM
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2005, 09:54:42 AM » |
|
I think this makes sense for me because the positions I am targeting are pretty deep and I should be able to get a solid player there. Plus, the Hawks have historically been a lotto team, so I have a chance at 2 lotto picks next season.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
HawksGM
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2005, 09:57:06 AM » |
|
yea, I wanted to get the top pick I could get to help my team out. I am traditionally an lotto pick, but I SHOULD be a little over .500 this year, whether that translates to lotto or non-lotto I'm not sure
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
NetsGM
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2005, 09:57:38 AM » |
|
Heavy price to move up 3 spots.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
HawksGM
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 05, 2005, 10:03:46 AM » |
|
Heavy price to move up 3 spots. yea it is, but I think there is 5 players who can contribute right now out of this draft and I'm tired of not being in the playoff race so I want to get one of the 5 of like |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
PacersGM
Guest
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 05, 2005, 10:13:13 AM » |
|
very heavy price with all the young and good teams in the east your pick will be next year a lotto pick again. and to move up three spots isn´t it worth. Also no one can guess what the top 3 picks will be since two picks will be coming from POs teams. maybe they will draft for needs instead of best player available.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
HawksGM
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 05, 2005, 10:16:57 AM » |
|
very heavy price with all the young and good teams in the east your pick will be next year a lotto pick again. and to move up three spots isn´t it worth. Also no one can guess what the top 3 picks will be since two picks will be coming from POs teams. maybe they will draft for needs instead of best player available. exactly, which means one of the best players available may fall to me at #5, because the Jazz and Wolves may pick for need, which means this deal makes even more sense. But also looking at those 2 teams their needs are probably the BPA at the time they draft |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
HawksGM
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 05, 2005, 10:28:41 AM » |
|
I also don't think the east is that predictable, the Raptors will have the same great core, but if they don't make strides in TC the gap between the rest of the east and them will close. The Nets have 4 players on their roster (all all-star's) but they will need a good FA period to maintain their dominance. The Pacers are gonna be great but if they can't re-sign Melo they will need a good TC to return to the finals. THe Magic, Sixers and Bulls will all still be good too. I'm just saying that there are plenty of variables and making the prediction that I won't make the playoffs before the draft, FA and TC based on the rosters as of now is a little early
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
PacersGM
Guest
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 05, 2005, 10:31:06 AM » |
|
hmm maybe you are right.
as i see it at the moment the wolves will pick a SG, seatle a pf, utah a pg and portland will do their usual CPU pick or something like that. so you should get a player ready to contribute on your biggest need position.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
HawksGM
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 05, 2005, 10:33:07 AM » |
|
hmm maybe you are right.
as i see it at the moment the wolves will pick a SG, seatle a pf, utah a pg and portland will do their usual CPU pick or something like that. so you should get a player ready to contribute on your biggest need position. yea I see it going , Gatling, Boykins, Schabinger, Miles and I take Nesterovich which is a good addition |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
HornetsGM
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 05, 2005, 11:37:34 AM » |
|
I don't understand, it looks like SF is your biggest position of need...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
HawksGM
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 05, 2005, 11:45:53 AM » |
|
I don't understand, it looks like SF is your biggest position of need... it is but I don't really think anyone is better than Tayshaun or even that much better than Josh Smith, so I'm trying to see the options at 5 that can maybe heal a few of my positional needs |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CelticsGM
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 05, 2005, 01:53:33 PM » |
|
I don't understand, it looks like SF is your biggest position of need... it is but I don't really think anyone is better than Tayshaun or even that much better than Josh Smith, so I'm trying to see the options at 5 that can maybe heal a few of my positional needs I've got some talent at the SF spot like Lenard, Pietrus or even Peterson and the C spot like Kaman and Duncan, so if yoou don't like the outcome of the draft I'm willing to trade someone if it fits an other need for me ... just pick BPA and we'll see. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Papa Tom's Boyz, makin da Big Wins now
(and still fighting for that ultimate - a title)
===============================
J-E-R-R-Y M-U-N-S-O-N (soon) Calv Natt
Rick Mahorn - Marques Embry - Evan Hunt
Mark Price - Ken Sharman - Kenny Barkley
Christian Clark - da FunderWy - Joe Kleine
|
|
|
|
