So the proposition is that we have the commissioner arbitrarily decide how many players get changed, which of these players gets changed, and what attributes get changed?
what, do you think a panel should decide who gets changed?
before the season begins, I'd look at the draft file. if the top of the draft is terrible, like these past 2 years, edit a few players to make top prospects. Actually make players that teams can build around.
Take a look at this past draft. Sonics got 3 of 4 top picks. Any of those players you'd build a team around? Any of those players you'd trade Kobe for, straight up? AND THEY WERE THE 3 BEST PLAYERS!
Basically, I don't think the draft is doing what it's supposed to do, which is give the terrible teams a chance to get a franchise player (not every year, but at least an all-star).
Any body in this draft look like a player that can turn a franchise around?
I'd edit the players before the first sim of the year. It would then be up the entire year, so everybody had ample time to look at it. Obviously, this year's draft wouldn't be altered, as it's already been posted.
And if it's an issue with me knowing which players have been altered, and knowing their true potentials, I wouldn't draft any of the players I've viewed. Even if I had the #1 pick.
And if it's an issue of me not keeping my word, well, if I really wanted to I could view everybody's true ratings. It's just an issue where you have to have trust, if not the league will fall apart.
Even if it was a sensible idea, I don't think it could ever be implemented.
It's implemented in pretty much every FBB league. Most commish's build their own draft files (or have someone else build a draft file, and the commish's go over it).