SonicsGM
GMs
GM
 Offline
Posts: 2042
|
 |
« on: October 14, 2007, 03:41:03 AM » |
|
They had what looks to be a solid FA class. How do you think they will do this year?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Str8westcoasta
|
|
« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2007, 06:05:44 AM » |
|
I think they're gunna kill it!
I say 55-27
There team is so balanced if everyone can stay healthy. Good job CPU
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
NetsGM
|
|
« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2007, 08:14:44 AM » |
|
If Sabonis does good, they can have a good year.
One thing to keep in mind, they're horrible at setting lineups. I.e., I'll guarantee you one of Flemming or O'Neil is on the bench (because the CPU has no creativity about changing positions).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
NetsGM
Guest
|
|
« Reply #3 on: October 14, 2007, 10:19:59 AM » |
|
If this team isn't interesting to an incoming GM, I don't know what team would be. The only real deficit, anywhere, is on the glass.
Superb at both guard spots, Sabonis could be studly. Move a 2G to the 3, trade one or two of 'em for a 4, and Bob's yer uncle, they could easily be a 50 win team.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
PacersGM
Guest
|
|
« Reply #4 on: October 14, 2007, 11:06:39 AM » |
|
well guess it is time to look for a new wolvesgm. the old one had enough time to be part of this league imo.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BullsGM3
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 14, 2007, 11:08:05 AM » |
|
If Sabonis does good, they can have a good year.
One thing to keep in mind, they're horrible at setting lineups. I.e., I'll guarantee you one of Flemming or O'Neil is on the bench (because the CPU has no creativity about changing positions).
They changed King's position back to SG. They don't have anyone listed as an SF right now. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
NetsGM
|
|
« Reply #6 on: October 14, 2007, 11:24:39 AM » |
|
If Sabonis does good, they can have a good year.
One thing to keep in mind, they're horrible at setting lineups. I.e., I'll guarantee you one of Flemming or O'Neil is on the bench (because the CPU has no creativity about changing positions).
They changed King's position back to SG. They don't have anyone listed as an SF right now. That's what I'm talking about. Since they're both listed as SG, one will start at SG, one will come off the bench at SG. By "changing positions", I meant "won't put someone in a different position on the depth chart than what they're listed". |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BullsGM3
|
|
« Reply #7 on: October 14, 2007, 11:27:02 AM » |
|
So you think they won't start anyone at SF then? I'd probably bring my win prediction down a bit if they're only going to run with 4 guys.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
NetsGM
|
|
« Reply #8 on: October 14, 2007, 11:32:05 AM » |
|
So you think they won't start anyone at SF then? I'd probably bring my win prediction down a bit if they're only going to run with 4 guys.
They'll start Rick Robey or Nickolas Majerle (probably Robey) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BullsGM3
|
|
« Reply #9 on: October 14, 2007, 11:33:35 AM » |
|
Oh crap why didn't I see those guys  Free Vern Fleming! (to the Bulls) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
HornetsGM
|
|
« Reply #10 on: October 14, 2007, 11:52:34 AM » |
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CelticsGM
|
|
« Reply #11 on: October 20, 2007, 01:42:50 AM » |
|
below .500 it's the cpu after all, which usually doesn't have a clue (unless there are superstars involved) this team has a weak frontcourt and it'll play .500 ball, but will finish slightly below. everyone else seems to disagree  and big big  at the poll options: "more than 50 wins" and "more than 30 losses" !!! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Papa Tom's Boyz, makin da Big Wins now
(and still fighting for that ultimate - a title)
===============================
J-E-R-R-Y M-U-N-S-O-N (soon) Calv Natt
Rick Mahorn - Marques Embry - Evan Hunt
Mark Price - Ken Sharman - Kenny Barkley
Christian Clark - da FunderWy - Joe Kleine
|
|
|
|
Str8westcoasta
|
|
« Reply #12 on: October 20, 2007, 05:42:33 AM » |
|
If there was a GM involved I think this team would be a force, however the CPU is retarded when it comes to depth charts. O'Neil has barely set foot on court with A+ defense
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
NetsGM
Guest
|
|
« Reply #13 on: October 20, 2007, 09:05:31 AM » |
|
I'd be willing to take on the Wolves. After all, they *are* in the other conference, so that eliminates concern of impropriety. And I won't trade with myself, unless the trade is reviewed by a panel of three (myself, my wife and my neighbour).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Str8westcoasta
|
|
« Reply #14 on: October 20, 2007, 09:45:21 AM » |
|
I'd be willing to take on the Wolves. After all, they *are* in the other conference, so that eliminates concern of impropriety. And I won't trade with myself, unless the trade is reviewed by a panel of three (myself, my wife and my neighbour).
I'm gunna vote no... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
