Bods messed up - hijacking thread discussion

[CavsGM]

I don't think you can trade the Sixers pick, without one in 2010.

[NetsGM]

Erm...um....

um....

shutup.

[RaptorsGM]

OWNED the boss.

Kudos.

[Keith]

I don't understand why people can't read the rules....

[RaptorsGM]

Yeah, it would have taken less time for him to read the rules than it would have for him to post:

Erm...um....

um....

shutup.

[NetsGM]

hm....

we all make mistakes.  I made a 1 sentence mistake, which is far different than posting a trade which you didn't check others are counting on to be correct.

Sorry, nice try, but yeah.

Now, get out of MY thread.

[CavsGM]

Booyah.

[NetsGM]

Keep discussions related to the status of players and asking price.

Seriously.

I made a mistake.  That's like...#2 since the league opened.  But this thread does have a purpose that I'd like it to maintain.

[BullsGM-old]

I never got how or why hijacking a thread took away from the original prupose of the thread.  As long as the first post and title are in tact

80% of the posts in this forum have come from hijacking RaptorGM's trade threads.  We as a league would be nothing without hijacking

[NetsGM]

You can discuss the merits of hijacking threads here.

As for RaptorsGM trade threads, hijacking his threads are the reason that this was added, both at his request and my agreement:

Post Trading blocks here. Keep discussions related to the status of players and asking price. Not the place for debates on players/worth/value.

[RaptorsGM]

Beauty.

Yes, my threads get hijacked.

Yes, for the most part, I like when it happens.

Yes, I'm glad we have the new rule in place

[Anonymous]

Yes, for the most part, I like when it happens.

Attention Whore

[RaptorsGM]

Yes, for the most part, I like when it happens.

Attention Whore

A-freakin-men.