BullsGM-old
old-gm's
GM
Offline
Posts: 1060
|
|
« Reply #15 on: September 06, 2005, 03:13:34 PM » |
|
You just can't have the same experience on an emulator though, you have to play it at the arcade or on the SNES
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NetsGM
|
|
« Reply #16 on: September 06, 2005, 03:14:57 PM » |
|
Well, I disagree. As long as you have a good controller. Or, get an snes emulator for the dc/xbox/ps2 and play it on there
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BullsGM-old
old-gm's
GM
Offline
Posts: 1060
|
|
« Reply #17 on: September 06, 2005, 03:17:08 PM » |
|
Well, I disagree. As long as you have a good controller. Or, get an snes emulator for the dc/xbox/ps2 and play it on there Yeah, I was thinking about soft modding my Xbox a few years ago but there's no point now, I rarely play it. As for emulator vs console/arcade, you can have a good controller but it's not as fun if you don't have someone playing with you. Having one person use the keyboard and one person use a controller sucks
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NetsGM
|
|
« Reply #18 on: September 06, 2005, 03:18:42 PM » |
|
both zsnes and snes9x have netplay features.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NetsGM
|
|
« Reply #19 on: September 06, 2005, 03:23:28 PM » |
|
BTW, this thread has now officially been hijacked TWICE.
Anyway (going back to my first hijacking), if I think I have one downfall, it will be my overall small lineup (6'10" center, 6'4" sg, 5'5" pg).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BullsGM-old
old-gm's
GM
Offline
Posts: 1060
|
|
« Reply #20 on: September 06, 2005, 03:23:31 PM » |
|
both zsnes and snes9x have netplay features. I haven't tried it, but I'm sure it doesn't have voice recognition (maybe I'm wrong though). It wouldn't be as fun as playing in the same room on a console
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NetsGM
|
|
« Reply #21 on: September 06, 2005, 03:24:22 PM » |
|
Eh, it depends on the game, really. I agree NBA Jam wouldn't be the same, but there are many other games that are now infinitely more replayable.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BullsGM-old
old-gm's
GM
Offline
Posts: 1060
|
|
« Reply #22 on: September 06, 2005, 03:28:59 PM » |
|
Well back to the Craw trade, I don't think it's set in stone that I'll be lotto anymore, although it's still likely. I got alot of depth now. If Palacio lives up to his ratings, Craw returns to 19 ppg form, Griff has another steady season as a 3rd option, and Mercer gets those turnovers down, I think I can sneak in. Tractor will be huge off the bench again with B+, B+ def/reb and Turk should do fine when given minutes. I'm also looking for another monster defensive season from Anderson
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NetsGM
|
|
« Reply #23 on: September 06, 2005, 03:34:28 PM » |
|
Bulls might have the talent for a playoff team, but the east is stacked.
Nets, Hornets, Pacers I think are 3 locks. I still think Magic and 76ers would be ahead of Bulls. As are the Raptors, with Deng's explosion. And probably the Wizards.
That leaves 1 spot between the Heat, Celtics, Pistons, Bulls, Cavs and last years playoff team, Bucks.
Gonna be tough.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BullsGM-old
old-gm's
GM
Offline
Posts: 1060
|
|
« Reply #24 on: September 06, 2005, 03:53:09 PM » |
|
I rank myself ahead of the Heat, Celtics, the Pistons (after Stan Mannings TC). I think the final spot will come down to the Bucks, Cavs (depends on how well Keogan plays and how Vince does at the 3) and myself. The Bucks could be a defensive liability with Ferry at B, Smith at B- and Nash at C+ but they still have a solid team
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
GoldenStateGM
GMs
GM
Offline
Posts: 2626
|
|
« Reply #25 on: September 06, 2005, 03:54:12 PM » |
|
Anyway (going back to my first hijacking), if I think I have one downfall, it will be my overall small lineup (6'10" center, 6'4" sg, 5'5" pg).
Well, since the game does not care about height unless it deals with inside defense, should not make a difference. And the 6'10" center was the defensive player of the year, who just got better at defense and rebounding.... ***shudder*** Both divisions are pretty tought at this point. But a perimeter attach with Mercer and Crawford might be very efective. very few teasm have really good defenders at PG and SG...
|
|
|
Logged
|
The 2026 Golden State Warriors The Youth Movement C: Patrick O'Bryant - The Giant Irishman PF : Shawn Kemp - Rebounding beast SF : Michael Beasley - Rehab? Really? SG : Batum or Rush - Who sucks less? PG : Russel Westbrook - Combo guard or PG? Pacific Division Leader : 2011, 2012, 2013, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2025, 2029 Western Conference Leader : 2011, 2012, 2013, 2020, 2022, 2029 Your Golden State Warriors, the 2013 SSBA Champions
|
|
|
SpursGM-old
|
|
« Reply #26 on: September 06, 2005, 03:55:19 PM » |
|
Celtics raises a good point in the signings thread....Cook was signed by Heat first. So Bulls can't sign him for this trade.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NetsGM
|
|
« Reply #27 on: September 06, 2005, 03:56:23 PM » |
|
Well, since the game does not care about height unless it deals with inside defense, should not make a difference. offense too. Makes sense, no? If you become a more effective defender if you're bigger, then an offensive player going against a bigger defensive player will be less effective
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NetsGM
|
|
« Reply #28 on: September 06, 2005, 03:57:24 PM » |
|
Bulls need to sign someone new.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BullsGM-old
old-gm's
GM
Offline
Posts: 1060
|
|
« Reply #29 on: September 06, 2005, 04:05:11 PM » |
|
EDIT: Spurs, got ya
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|