My Attempt at a Mock Draft

[HawksGM]

if he's available at your pick he might not fall to me anyway

Who knows, I may very well not keep my pick.

a possible trade in the work for the Nets...I'm guessing it's not you moving into the lottery because you did a mock

[GoldenStateGM]

Very good chance Miles falls...  just like Snow did last year for the Celtics.  There are enough decent points in the league now, that PG's have a tendency to fall.

Of course, I think Schabinger has a big bonus most people overlook.  He is a C rebounder for a PG.  That may be good for 5-6 rpg out of your point.  He will help any team with their rebounding, as well as his PG skills...

[HawksGM]

Very good chance Miles falls...  just like Snow did last year for the Celtics.  There are enough decent points in the league now, that PG's have a tendency to fall.

Of course, I think Schabinger has a big bonus most people overlook.  He is a C rebounder for a PG.  That may be good for 5-6 rpg out of your point.  He will help any team with their rebounding, as well as his PG skills...

thats a good point, he's as good ratings wise as my 7'4 center rebounding and if I take Nesterovich then my PF would be a C rebounder but Gadz at B+ backing up both is good

[GoldenStateGM]

Hmmm...  not sure if you can win without at least one double digit rebounder, or at least a dominant rebounder at some position (AK47, for example...)
I had a B+ and a B- rebounder starting, and a B+ off the bench at the power spots, and that only got me to even rebounding...

[HawksGM]

Hmmm...  not sure if you can win without at least one double digit rebounder...

yea, Gadz will be that guy if he starts, but I'm still kinda clueless which way to go in the draft, Nesterovich, Strong or even Russell, but he's basically Iggy at the SF

[NetsGM]

Hmmm...  not sure if you can win without at least one double digit rebounder...

*cough*utah jazz*cough*

[GoldenStateGM]

*cough*utah jazz*cough*

Lol... Was editing as you typed, lol...
The Jazz had a dominant rebounder at SF in AK47.

Tough to tell the truth, though, they made so many changes during the season.
Murphy pulled down 8+ rebounds in 27 minutes...  not bad at all...

[CavsGM]

I'm hoping that a couple good players can fall to 11 and 13...

[NetsGM]

The Jazz had a dominant rebounder at SF in AK47.

During the playoffs, the Jazz did have one player average double digit rebounds.
C: Booth (31.7 mpg) - 10.2 rpg
PF: Murphy (29.4 mpg) - 8.9 rpg
SF: Kirilenko  (35.7 mpg) - 7.0 rpg
SG: Hughes (35 mpg) - 5.6 rpg
PG: Daniels (30.2 mpg) - 3.9 rpg

[GoldenStateGM]

C: Booth (31.7 mpg) - 10.2 rpg
PF: Murphy (29.4 mpg) - 8.9 rpg
SF: Kirilenko  (35.7 mpg) - 7.0 rpg
SG: Hughes (35 mpg) - 5.6 rpg
PG: Daniels (30.2 mpg) - 3.9 rpg

Dabods, you are chock full of great info

Both Hughes and AK are very good rebounders for their positions.
And 10 rpg in 32 mpg is quite good....

[HawksGM]

I have some insider information on the #3 pick...I just had lunch at Subway with the JazzGM and I found out at least one player who will be off the board w/my #5 pick, but I will keep that pick to myself until tonights 1-5 picks and say I told you so

[JazzGM-old]

I feel like I'm a girl on her period, my moods keep chaning about my #5 pick, Stong's better offensivley and rebounding and Nesterovich is a better defender

I can't believe you even went there...

[RaptorsGM]

I'm hoping that a couple good players can fall to 11 and 13...

I'm hoping I can get one at 16.

[HeatGM]

the draft class isnt really good at all.... gatling is terrific....but the rest of the draft would be bad...

[NetsGM]

Well, got 4 of 10 picks exactly correct.  Would have had 5 of 10 correct had I not changed my opinion on the hawks.  Last time I take his word at face value