Draft is up

[CelticsGM]

but just that i don't like it doesn't mean it has to be changed. If you, and maybe bods are fine with it, no problem.

[NetsGM]

If you entered in your draft list, you'll have to re-enter it.  When removing last years lists I accidentally removed this years as well.

Need to get the draft file from Doug and I'll get the true potentials online.

As for the draft file itself, Paul's defense is probably a bit high, but other than that I think the draft file is good.  Paul itself is pretty much right-on otherwise (isn't going to score a lot, great passer, good rebounder for a guard), and the draft file outside of Paul looks good as well.

[JazzGM-old2]

Can you tell me what John Stockton's ratings should have been?  In another sim league I was in he came into the league with worse ratings than Jay Humphries and that always infuriated me.  (I thought it was based on college ranks where Stockton was clearly better, so if it was based on 1st year production maybe that explains it)

[JazzGM-old2]

Dont' get me wrong, I think it's TERRIFIC that we are using a non-twink system here.  TERRIFIC.  Just run the numbers.  That's the only way to go.

[SpursGM-old]

Can you tell me what John Stockton's ratings should have been?  In another sim league I was in he came into the league with worse ratings than Jay Humphries and that always infuriated me.  (I thought it was based on college ranks where Stockton was clearly better, so if it was based on 1st year production maybe that explains it)

Based on his rookie year the ratings I got were: C C B+ A- D

But he really didn't become a full time starter until his 4th season.  If you use his 4th year stats then his ratings become: C+ B- A+ A D+

If you use his career stats...then C+ B A+ A D

[NetsGM]

you can now purchase draftees real potentials.

Sorry for the delay.