Picks 21-29 of the first round

[NetsGM]

2015    170    Pistons    Draft SF Marty Byrnes with pick #21 of round 1.
2015    170    Suns    Draft SG Michael Schader with pick #22 of round 1.
2015    170    Pistons    Draft SG Levi Haskins with pick #23 of round 1.
2015    170    Lakers    Draft SG Roger Phegley with pick #24 of round 1.
2015    170    Trailblazers    Draft SG Myles Greiner with pick #25 of round 1.
2015    170    Clippers    Draft PG Martin Sura with pick #26 of round 1.
2015    170    Suns    Draft C Skyler Buckner with pick #27 of round 1.
2015    170    Hornets    Draft PF Jim Fagan with pick #28 of round 1.
2015    170    Nets    Draft SF Frankie Sanders with pick #29 of round 1.


*******************

Man, as Martin Sura was falling, I was really hoping he'd fall to me.  I thought he was worthy of around a 15th pick.

[RaptorsGM]

I can't believe Sura was passed up by that many people.

I thought he would go 21st without question.

[Iverson2Korver43]

Pistons weren't worried about getting a PG...  I got very solid SG and SF prospects both with "A" potential and both good enough to get minutes with thier current ratings(atleast on my shitty team)...

[MavsGM]

Same thing with Cheeks' situation.  I don't think teams need a PG, pretty much every teams are set at the point position. 

[CelticsGM]

Pistons weren't worried about getting a PG...  I got very solid SG and SF prospects both with "A" potential and both good enough to get minutes with thier current ratings(atleast on my shitty team)...

I really can't believe you gave up on Kent for Haskins and Byrnes. Byrnes needa a huge TCs to get a decent backups imho, and Haskins is a project at a position where you have Jeannette and Hunter (plus I would have taken Phegley over him, who looks a lot more promising). Man, Kent is so much better and so much more promising at a more important position.

Schmaltz for Maggette is just about fair, one big scorer for a fine big man with defense and shot blocking. But the rest of the deal looks worse with every pick. And it's not like you didn't know who was available when you made the trade !!!

(btw, Pistons, please don't take that personally, it's just my opinion. I really don't want to step on your toes ...)

[CelticsGM]

Jim Fagan ?

was that a cpu pick

[MavsGM]

Jim Fagan ?

was that a cpu pick

Probably.  But I thought the CPU take the best player available ratings wise.

[CelticsGM]

Jim Fagan ?

was that a cpu pick

Probably.  But I thought the CPU take the best player available ratings wise.

no, the cpu just takes the position it believes you need most (but not by looking at the positional distribution on your roster but looking at an "original position" rating behind that).

but then a strange syntax picks a player that often wouldn't be considered BPA for that position. Earlier i thought the cpu knows more about true pot and selects hidden gems probably, but that Brent Mercer cpu pick at #2 in 2007 was completely off.

On the other side, the cpu also selected the top pick in DJSL once (Oden) and would have selected Patterson this year too (since PG was a need for my Magic), so it's no random selection process ...

 

[Iverson2Korver43]

Pistons weren't worried about getting a PG...  I got very solid SG and SF prospects both with "A" potential and both good enough to get minutes with thier current ratings(atleast on my shitty team)...

I really can't believe you gave up on Kent for Haskins and Byrnes. Byrnes needa a huge TCs to get a decent backups imho, and Haskins is a project at a position where you have Jeannette and Hunter (plus I would have taken Phegley over him, who looks a lot more promising). Man, Kent is so much better and so much more promising at a more important position.

Schmaltz for Maggette is just about fair, one big scorer for a fine big man with defense and shot blocking. But the rest of the deal looks worse with every pick. And it's not like you didn't know who was available when you made the trade !!!

(btw, Pistons, please don't take that personally, it's just my opinion. I really don't want to step on your toes ...)

Not that I need to explain my every move to you, but I am ready to completely rebuild and start from the ground up...  That is why basically all my players are available for Future 1st's and expirings...  Schmaltz can only play in one type of system or else he is an ineffective 22 and 10 Center(and that system is not how I want to play)...  Also, I realy don't see anything wrong with my pick...  Byrnes and Haskins are both potential starters, and all it would take is a couple decent TC's...

[BlazersGM]

NOW THIS WAS A BAD LUCK.....i sent a list of 5 players, and whom i got ??? the 5th one of course, dammit....he better have some good true potential alongside with his youth (20) and already decent B inside and defense ratings....otherwise he'll be shipped to the international Blazers Moon Base (and there's no turning back as couple of fellow Blazers lost kids know).

[CavsGM]

Damn, I wanted Sura but Wizards told me he would take him, and then he trades the pick. And I also traded him my pick which I could have got for the Rockets 2017 1st...

[WolvesGM]

S

Damn, I wanted Sura but Wizards told me he would take him, and then he trades the pick. And I also traded him my pick which I could have got for the Rockets 2017 1st...

Sorry?