SSBA

let me know what you prefer !

The Nets offered to sim this season, and i would welcome if Bods can still play commish (and i don't think there's a whole lot to do for that) before we can move to the online version.

Yeah, I also like the idea of NetsGM or some credible GM to do the simming for the mean time. I mean, what harm can it do? :D

I didn't vote but that is because of the options.  I think that this league is a benevolent dictatorship...or in basketball terms: its Bod's ball and he allows us to play.

Waiting 2 weeks for the online version is fine but it puts pressure on Derek and it may not happen in 2 weeks.  A long delay could be harmful to the health of the league imo.

Nets simming is also OK with me...but forcing Bods into the commish role isn't.  See second sentence in this post.

Anyone else simming is also OK with me.  As long as they have an idea of what they are committing to do.  I think it would be best for the league to move forward.

And finally I do care otherwise I wouldn't have been involved for all these (sim) years.

Keep the ball rolling.

if bods only need 2 weeks to finish his version i will do the offseason simming. that is about the same time he will need. thanks for the kind words.

Maybe I'm dumb, but I'm not getting this huge distinction between simming and commishing? How often do we run into disputes that require mediation that haven't been resolved by the simmer?

I haven't voted either, Spurs makes some salient points, and I'm happy to sim for the season (even though I'm currently going through FA in RBSL and it reminds me of the tediousness of getting into it again right away - but I'm willing to do it for the swell fellas of SSBA, and its really a small thing) or have someone else do it if there's a volunteer - I'm just not willing to vote for myself, that's goofy.

If I didn't mention, this is a pretty busy time for me so I probably wouldn't be simming right on the nose like Pacers was, but I'd get'ter done.