Title: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: PacersGM on February 02, 2008, 09:11:45 AM well i understand that they had to trade him but come on this worse than the garnett trade.
just expirings pretty bad picks with the main core of the lakers all under 30 years of age. Javaris has some talent but why trade for him with mike conley allready the PG of the future. and the lakers didn?t even had to add a bad contract like cardinal or swift. this trade makes no sense other than we will have no the classic Lakers - Celtics rivalery back. the lakers are so deep now that someone like walton could fell from starter to not playing at all. Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: NetsGM on February 02, 2008, 09:17:08 AM I like Crittenton, but they already have 2 good young pg's. The lakers picks won't be worth much, and who knows if with the Grizzlies ownership situation if they even use the cap space. I agree, terrible return.
Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: HornetsGM on February 02, 2008, 09:38:14 AM Yup, as I said in the Sixers RealGM forum, terrible return.
Let's look at this from a FBB standpoint: Lakers trade: Kwame Brown -- B- C- D- B+ B- C Crittenton -- C+ C B B C- A 2 late firsts Grizz trade: Pau Gasol -- A- C C A- B C We would definitely flame anyone who made a trade like that in this league. Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: NetsGM on February 02, 2008, 09:39:52 AM Quote Yup, as I said in the Sixers RealGM forum, terrible return. Who are you? Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: WizardsGM on February 02, 2008, 09:58:01 AM You would like to think they could have gotten more, but the one good thing about this deal is that they have about $15mil in cap room after the draft, which is the most out of any team in the league. So they could offer the most money to the biggest free agents. Though if they come up empty, then its a huge huge mistake.
Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: NetsGM on February 02, 2008, 11:04:21 AM Quote but the one good thing about this deal is that they have about $15mil in cap room after the draft, which is the most out of any team in the league. It's actually about $10 million. they have about $48.5 million in committed salaries for next year, which puts them about a half million ahead of the Sixers for most in the league (assuming the Sixers don't renounce their rights to Iguodala or Lou Williams). Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: PacersGM on February 02, 2008, 12:17:44 PM they will be around 44 mill next season. but i guess Miller will be next. Maybe they deal him to Miami.
if they can get beasley it might be worth but FA won?t save the situation in Memphis. Remember who they signed with their money this year (Darko) and before (Cardinal). maybe they save the money for 09 or even 010. Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: WizardsGM on February 02, 2008, 12:43:58 PM dont count out the Stro Swift to Nets deal being for Magloire instead of Collins, Magloire is expiring
Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: NetsGM on February 02, 2008, 02:00:11 PM Quote dont count out the Stro Swift to Nets deal being for Magloire instead of Collins, Magloire is expiring If that becomes a finished deal, then it could change things. But as of right now they're about the exact same as the Sixers (ca 10 million). Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: WizardsGM on February 02, 2008, 02:16:18 PM Quote dont count out the Stro Swift to Nets deal being for Magloire instead of Collins, Magloire is expiring If that becomes a finished deal, then it could change things. But as of right now they're about the exact same as the Sixers (ca 10 million). Hollinger reported 15 so I am not sure why the big difference. Someone has an option that wont be picked up that we arent counting? Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: HornetsGM on February 02, 2008, 02:18:15 PM Quote Yup, as I said in the Sixers RealGM forum, terrible return. Who are you? phiphan Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: NetsGM on February 02, 2008, 02:22:39 PM Hollinger could also be wrong. It does happen from time to time where sportswriters are wrong.
I've checked storytellers, hoopshype, and partricia bender, and I don't see any options I'm missing. Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: PacersGM on February 02, 2008, 02:50:17 PM from my information:
This is what they have committed for next year. Mike Jesus Miller: $9,128,575 Darko Milicic: $7,020,000 Brian Cardinal: $6,300,000 Swift or Collins (they earn the same): $6,200,000 Mike Conley: $3,630,480 Rudy Gay: $2,579,400 Hakim Warrick: $2,119,102 Javaris Crittenton: $1,381,560 Kyle Lowry: $1,163,520 Total: $39,522,637 Total doesn't include Stoudamire's buyout, which is somewhere between $0 and $2.3 million. Probably about somewhere halfway between. FREE AGENTS TO BE RENOUNCED BECAUSE WHO GIVES A TOSS: Andre Brown (cap hold would be $963,263) Casey Jacobsen (cap hold would be $924,732) Kwame Brown (cap hold would be $13,612,500) FREE AGENTS THEY'LL WANT TO KEEP: Juan Carlos Navarro (cap hold would be $886,517) For only having 11 players under contract, including renouncements, an additional cap hold of $442,114 will be billed for the 12th spot. Now, for argument's sake, let's assume Damon got exactly half of his guaranteed money, leaving a buyout of $1.15 million with no set-off. Let's assume that all except Navarro are renounced, and let's assume that they pick third. That gives Memphis a salary figure, before free agency, of $43,905,468, versus a salary cap of $57 millionish. Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: NetsGM on February 02, 2008, 06:52:43 PM Damon's contract was for 4.65 million next year, not 2.3. I doubt his buyout is 1.15 million for a 4.6 million contract. They also have the Lakers pick, which is another million, as well as a 2nd rounder (if they keep it).
Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: BlazersGM on February 02, 2008, 07:04:22 PM This is the worst trade ever that i know of, just horrible, makes 0 sense for Memphis, picks will be worthless. And LA got Pau for FREE. Good job.
Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: WizardsGM on February 02, 2008, 10:52:53 PM Its not the worst ever, its more than Toronto got for Vince.
Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: BlazersGM on February 03, 2008, 04:16:36 PM Disagree.
Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: WizardsGM on February 03, 2008, 09:07:17 PM OK, please state how.
Memphis got a big expiring. Toronto got to pay off Mourning who stuck on their cap for 2 or 3 extra seasons, plus they got Eric Williams and Aaron Williams for multiple seasons, and multiple sucking. No expirings. Memphis got a good prospect in Crittenton, even if they are stacked at the position. Toronto got no prospects. Both teams got 2 picks, all 4 picks were/will be non-lotto. One of the picks Babcock used on Joey Graham, who might as well have not been picked at all. Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: NetsGM on February 03, 2008, 10:11:43 PM Quote Memphis got a big expiring. Toronto got to pay off Mourning who stuck on their cap for 2 or 3 extra seasons, plus they got Eric Williams and Aaron Williams for multiple seasons, and multiple sucking. No expirings. Didn't toronto also get Joey Graham? Not that that really changes things. Title: Re: the GASol trade - why did they trade him for nothing? Post by: WizardsGM on February 03, 2008, 10:52:02 PM Quote Memphis got a big expiring. Toronto got to pay off Mourning who stuck on their cap for 2 or 3 extra seasons, plus they got Eric Williams and Aaron Williams for multiple seasons, and multiple sucking. No expirings. Didn't toronto also get Joey Graham? Not that that really changes things. LOL He was drafted with one of the 2 picks received from the Nets. You know, the pick BEFORE Danny Granger went :bods: |