SSBA

i have the following point guards on my roster right now:

540 Chauncey Billups PG 28 6'3'' 202 C+ A- B+ B- C- C
103 Nathaniel Van Exel PG 20 6'1'' 202 C- B- C B+ C- B
96 Troy Havlicek PG 19 5'6'' 193 C- B B B D C


i dont want or need 3 PG's i'll keep them all, but maybe someone needs a point, and could help me out with some swingmen.

i am specifically looking for swingmen that can help provide depth.

Havlicek is least likely to be dealt, with Billups and Van Exel looking to POSSIBLY move.

if you have any interest, let me know and we can talk.

Van Exel for Jacobsen???

I do want Casey back, but i think i'd be able to get more for NVE than just Casey. But, maybe we can workout something to bring casey back home

I could toss in 2007 Hawks 2nd round pick...

nope sorry

any one in need of a pg?

i really neet some swingmen, and depth up front, so i'm looking to make a move, billups was very solid last yr 13 pts 8 ast, and onlt 2.7 to's per game.

and for teams that may need some depth at pg or need to groom a future pg, Nate VanExel is available, and he's B- outside, B+ on def, and is young and on a rookie contract. let me know if there is any interest.

Wang Zhi Zhi is availabe for some help up front

thanks for the offer, but i think i'll pass, i dont want someone who'll be walking after the season, i need to make sure theyre locked up for at least 2 years

No one needs a backup pg, or a young pg to groom to replace their current pg?

I've had a few offers for my pg's but, but i'm looking to see what i can get.

Send out some offers,

I'm sure young Nate VanExel or super solid vet Chauncy Billups would look good backing up or starting on your team :D

All our PG problems were solved via the draft.  You're about 1 week too late my friend  :)

Do you really trust a rookie PG?

THat's a good point. I think too many people get caught up in potential and youth.

For me, I went out and got Sam Cassell to play ahead of Ellis for a year, because I don't want to try and win a Championship with a rookie PG.

Butr does being a rookie really mean anything in this league?  Age might, be being a rookie?

It just means that his better years are ahead of him. Because playing time isn't factored into a player's development, and because most rookies have high potential, you know he is going to get better, even if you play himoff the bench.

Not nesessarily.  But unless you have extra swingmen to throw away, why deplete your perimeter to obtain a player that plays a position you're full in?  In my case, yes, I'm comfortable with Mercer.