SSBA

League Information => Questions => Topic started by: Iverson2Korver43 on January 15, 2007, 12:25:47 PM



Title: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: Iverson2Korver43 on January 15, 2007, 12:25:47 PM
not sure if you remember this trade or not:

http://forums.ssbabasketball.com/index.php?topic=1867.0

but here is a little quote from Derek:

"Pet peeve time, and something to specify for future instances.

Obviously, I can't hold PistonsGM to the deal.  And I don't know exactly how it went down.  But for future trades, keep this in mind.

By definition, an "offer" is an agreement.  If the other party agrees to your offer, you have a contract.  It doesn't have to go back to you.  If I get a job offer from company Y, and accept it, I've got a job.

Therefore, if you want to present it as not an offer, you have to specifically state this this is only an "idea" in the originating pm.  Otherwise, it's an offer.

For future reference, specify whether it's an offer or an idea (and understand the difference between the two), otherwise I'll hold you to it.  And I can check the exact verbiage of any pm if I want to go into the database manually to do so."

So if you use the word "offer" you will go back in the PM's and hold them to the deal, but not when they say "Post it"...  I thought my original argument was more than enough to get something done, but you said you wouldn't even check my PM's...  It may seem like I am beating a dead horse, but a little clarification in the rules would be nice...  Not just for me, but for everyone...


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: NetsGM on January 15, 2007, 12:35:34 PM
Here's also a nice little rule:
http://kb.ssbabasketball.com/wiki/GM_Check-In_%28Rules%29
Quote
If you miss more than 1/2 of the Check-In's in a season (6 missed sims of the 12 sim regular season), I have the option to replace you as GM, regardless of if you respond to the e-mail. The decision will be based upon your reason for missing the sims and past history in the league. The missed DC's can also be marked as tanking (aka, abandoning your team to intentionally lose games), and can be subject to the penalties described in the Tanking Page

http://files.ssbabasketball.com/files/Check-In/2017_check-in.htm
PistonsGM     9

Maybe a little more activity and your team would be in slightly better shape.

Now, since we've both thrown out rules we think should be enforced, onto your situation.

I stated, explicitly to you, that my decision not to enforce it was because he had changed his mind in a very short time frame (8 minutes).  He did so before you posted, and before you had time where that agreed upon deal influenced your future decisions.  I don't want to get to the point where a player cannot change his mind whatsoever.

The post you referenced was different because he had agreed to a trade, it was posted, then he tried to change his mind.  I've also enforced it when a player agreed, then denies he agreed.  In the end, there is not, nor can there be, any concrete rules.  It's discretion from my part based on what I deem is the most fair.  The official rule is that if you say you agree, I can hold you to it.  This doesn't mean that I will 100% of the time, as it still depends on what I think is the best resolution.  He agreed, changed his mind before it was posted, and it went to arbitration, and I made my decision.  Live with it.


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: KingsGM-old on January 15, 2007, 12:47:32 PM
Quote
The missed DC's can also be marked as tanking (aka, abandoning your team to intentionally lose games), and can be subject to the penalties described in the Tanking Page

Look mom, there's a rule about me on the internet. :P :lol:


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: KingsGM-old on January 15, 2007, 12:54:30 PM
Btw What happened to "Can i post that" rule?


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: Iverson2Korver43 on January 15, 2007, 01:07:47 PM
my team would be in better shape???  just because I didn't post a DC???  If you want to, replace me...  oh well...  He would have had no chance to change his mind if he didn't know who was available(which neither of us did when the trade was agreed upon)...  We were both taking a chance(it's not like the deal was created and cancelled within an hour...  This trade had been worked on for well over a day...  What if I had posted it in that 8 minute time frame, would it be valid???  So instead of living my life, I should sit here and refresh my SSBA Forum page every minute???  This is a joke...  You want to fire me, then so be it...  maybe I've already wasted to much time here...  Maybe It's not even really about the trade, it's the principle and the fact I have had a problem with the GrizzGM in past... 


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: Iverson2Korver43 on January 15, 2007, 01:13:24 PM
Here's also a nice little rule:
http://kb.ssbabasketball.com/wiki/GM_Check-In_%28Rules%29
Quote
If you miss more than 1/2 of the Check-In's in a season (6 missed sims of the 12 sim regular season), I have the option to replace you as GM, regardless of if you respond to the e-mail. The decision will be based upon your reason for missing the sims and past history in the league. The missed DC's can also be marked as tanking (aka, abandoning your team to intentionally lose games), and can be subject to the penalties described in the Tanking Page

http://files.ssbabasketball.com/files/Check-In/2017_check-in.htm
PistonsGM     9

Maybe a little more activity and your team would be in slightly better shape.

Now, since we've both thrown out rules we think should be enforced, onto your situation.

I stated, explicitly to you, that my decision not to enforce it was because he had changed his mind in a very short time frame (8 minutes).  He did so before you posted, and before you had time where that agreed upon deal influenced your future decisions.  I don't want to get to the point where a player cannot change his mind whatsoever.

The post you referenced was different because he had agreed to a trade, it was posted, then he tried to change his mind.  I've also enforced it when a player agreed, then denies he agreed.  In the end, there is not, nor can there be, any concrete rules.  It's discretion from my part based on what I deem is the most fair.  The official rule is that if you say you agree, I can hold you to it.  This doesn't mean that I will 100% of the time, as it still depends on what I think is the best resolution.  He agreed, changed his mind before it was posted, and it went to arbitration, and I made my decision.  Live with it.

And in my personal opinion i think it was a bullshit decision...  but that's only my opinion...  Did you even get any statements from the other GM???  Or was my side the only one that was argued???  It really makes no sense that the decision went in his favor, especially since he never commented on it...  Either way it is looking as if my days are numbered...  Atleast it was fun for the most part, and although I didn't post my DC's(Yes, I was tanking even though I didn't have my 1st) I have given up many hours of family time in favor of this league...


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: NetsGM on January 15, 2007, 01:26:00 PM
1) It's become quite obvious that this thread has become about the Pistons trade situation, not "clarification for future reference
2) Bringing up the missed DC's was not to point to tanking, but to inactivity.  More specifically it was to point out that the strict enforcement of every rule isn't necessarily the right decision.
3) Had you posted before he PM'd you saying he changed his mind, it probably would have been enforced.
4) You said, and I quote: "So instead of living my life, I should sit here and refresh my SSBA Forum page every minute???".  So he had changed his mind before you had even read it?  So, how did his agreeing, then going back on his agreement, hurt you?


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: HeatGM on January 15, 2007, 08:15:28 PM
Quote
IMO... no one should back out from a trade that he has agreed to it...no matter how quick he changed his mind...its like playing nba live wherein you press the accept/reject button in a trade offer ..further more if you sent an offer...it already understood that you had approve and agreed to it...an offer should look like an offer with salaries and the players that should be traded...otherwise it is just an idea... that's my opinion...but i trust bods would make a fair  decision...   

This is not NBA Live.  The comparison, IMO, is irrelevant.

Let's compare it to what we strive to be.  What we strive to emulate.  When does a trade become official, binding, in the NBA?  Is it before or after it's submitted to the league office?

We are FAR stricter than the NBA in this regard.  But I'm also not trying to emulate NBA Live.


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: Iverson2Korver43 on January 16, 2007, 03:28:31 AM
I have not heard of one GM say they would side with GrizzGM's side of the case(oh wait, he never stated anything about  it)...  He knows what he did was wrong, so does every GM...  And I am going to leave it at that...


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: CelticsGM on January 16, 2007, 04:34:53 AM
hey, i'm on your side when it comes to this trade.

but ...

from a commish standpoint this was a wise decision. It's one thing that reputation is hurt and feelings are hurt. But from the contractual/rules standpoint it would be FORCING a trade that's clearly been called off, no matter how poor the Grizz' decision looks here.


Please have no harsh feelings towards the commish, he has to protect league integrity as well, and there has to be some freedom to talk/negotiate/change your mind as well.

We'll all learn from this and move on ...
 :cheers:


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: NetsGM on January 16, 2007, 10:27:10 AM
Quote
IMO... no one should back out from a trade that he has agreed to it...no matter how quick he changed his mind...its like playing nba live wherein you press the accept/reject button in a trade offer ..further more if you sent an offer...it already understood that you had approve and agreed to it...an offer should look like an offer with salaries and the players that should be traded...otherwise it is just an idea... that's my opinion...but i trust bods would make a fair  decision...   

This is not NBA Live.  The comparison, IMO, is irrelevant.

Let's compare it to what we strive to be.  What we strive to emulate.  When does a trade become official, binding, in the NBA?  Is it before or after it's submitted to the league office?

We are FAR stricter than the NBA in this regard.  But I'm also not trying to emulate NBA Live.


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: NetsGM on January 16, 2007, 10:31:42 AM
And the Grizz don't comment because this is not a public debate, as much as PistonsGM is trying to make it one.  I have talked to him privately about it.


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: Iverson2Korver43 on January 16, 2007, 01:26:45 PM
Of course I am going to make this public...  That's the whole point, I knew there was no way to go back on this trade...  I just want everyone to know how shady the GrizzGM is...  like I said, It's just one less GM I will deal with in this league...


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: NetsGM on January 16, 2007, 01:53:28 PM
You know what, screw it.

There isn't a place in this league for a public smear campaign.  And I've lost patience.

Pursuant to the rules set forth in the GM Check-in (http://kb.ssbabasketball.com/wiki/GM_Check-In_%28Rules%29) section of the rules page, and due to the missed time in the 2017 season (http://files.ssbabasketball.com/files/Check-In/2017_check-in.htm), PistonsGM has been removed as the GM of the Pistons.  Effective immediately, I will be making the decisions for the Pistons team until a replacement GM is found.


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: KingsGM-old on January 16, 2007, 02:00:47 PM
Oh man, what's going on here? Pistons fired?


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: NetsGM on January 16, 2007, 02:04:37 PM
No.

I've relieved him of his duties so he can spend more time with his family.


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: BlazersGM on January 16, 2007, 02:48:40 PM
OHH

well i dont know why you even discussed it, as we all know trade is only agreedon /DONE  after we post it in completed trades, and other GM quotes the trade and says i accept. Thats the only rule, no PM's, emails, fedex accepts.


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: NetsGM on January 16, 2007, 06:50:45 PM
Um....no.

I've made a point of holding people to verbal agreements they've made.  One of the things that drives me nuts is people agreeing to a trade, the other party posting it, then the person changing their mind.  I have, and will continue to, hold people to agreements they made via PM.

However, since he had changed his mind about the trade before PistonsGM even read the agreement, I felt that this was a different situation.

PistonsGM is not gone because he disagreed with me.  He's gone for a few reasons:
1) He was not an active GM.  Not last year, and not in years past.  In fact, before this trade debacle, his last post was over 3 weeks ago.  I had considered finding a new PistonsGM before, this was just the last straw.
2) He's an instigator, and a constant complainer.  We've had more than a few run-ins in the past, and any judgement that didn't go his way he took personally.
3) His effort to make a public campaign to smear GrizzliesGM was simply the last straw.

All in all, the reason he's gone is inactivity.  Being an ass just made the decision easy.


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: CavsGM on January 16, 2007, 06:54:33 PM
Don't get on Derek's bad side...

 :lol:


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: BlazersGM on January 16, 2007, 07:08:32 PM
hehehe, true, just kidding :P

anyways, verbal PM agreements should not be decisive i think, i think QUOTE/ACCEPT under completed trades should be, everyone can "promise" or say something, but after its posted under completed trades, if other team changes his mind, he can  reject it, i dont care actually about this rules tough 'cause once i give my word and post it i will do it, few times it happened to me also that i changed my mind after agreeing but i kept my word and i posted ACCEPT even i wanted to change it or bla bla but WORD is a WORD, and if i said POST and changed my mind, i still didnt want to "hurt LOL" the other party by changing it.

Im drunk so this post should be deleted :P


Title: Re: Trade Agreements - A little clarification...
Post by: SonicsGM on January 17, 2007, 12:05:42 AM
Of course I am going to make this public...  That's the whole point, I knew there was no way to go back on this trade...  I just want everyone to know how shady the GrizzGM is...  like I said, It's just one less GM I will deal with in this league...

Just to rid some of the smear off the smear campaign...

I just did a deal with the Grizz, and it worked out for the both of us.  I'd like to publicly say that he is not "shady"

That's all.