Title: Magic Post by: KingsGM-old on October 05, 2006, 08:37:00 AM Was wondering where does Magic ranks among all time rookies in SSBA?
18.5ppg, 6rpg, 8apg, 1.5spg, 50% from the floor. Title: Re: Magic Post by: PacersGM on October 05, 2006, 09:43:30 AM maybe at 18th place :tup: there were better players coming into this league in the early drafts :shock:
Title: Re: Magic Post by: KingsGM-old on October 05, 2006, 09:48:36 AM Who? Only Yao, Pettit comes to mind.
Title: Re: Magic Post by: NetsGM on October 05, 2006, 06:27:49 PM um...yao wasn't drafted.
Title: Re: Magic Post by: BucksGM on October 05, 2006, 06:39:32 PM a lot of rookies have put up good numbers. Keogan and Gatling come to mind. Ferry and Petit etc.
Magic's good, but he's not the second coming :D Title: Re: Magic Post by: CelticsGM on October 06, 2006, 06:02:37 AM I made an overview of good rookie seasons, and Magic is right there.
Not the best IMHO, which belongs to Pettit, Ferry and Mercer, but among the best. The table below is sorted by PPG, and among all those rookies i'd rank Earvin probably around #5-8 Looking at PGs only i'd rank him below Mercer and ahead of O'Connell, Milner, English and Marquez. 8)
you agree ? :cheers: Title: Re: Magic Post by: KingsGM-old on October 06, 2006, 07:16:03 AM Below Mercer but ahead of O'Connel? You got be kidding.
Title: Re: Magic Post by: CelticsGM on October 06, 2006, 07:54:35 AM you are right.
It should read 1. Mercer 2. O'Connell 3. Magic Just looked it up, and saw that Barton never was offensive option in his rookie season. Still he scored 12ppg on fantastic percentages and had more assists and less TOs than Magic. Mercer isn't even debateable, he was all offense the Bulls had back then, with only young Eddy Curry and Griffin there to help him. He had to do it all as a rookie and was main focus of the opponents defense, yet still he had those great statline. btw, one more rookie I forgot in my list who clearly belongs:
:cheers: Title: Re: Magic Post by: KingsGM-old on October 06, 2006, 08:01:15 AM Never liked Mercer. He was like Steve Francis, i would rather keep him on the bench. He haven't improved a single team. Shoot first pg with alots of turnovers. Can't get worst.
Title: Re: Magic Post by: GoldenStateGM on October 06, 2006, 08:05:35 AM Shoot first pg with alots of turnovers. And how does that not describe Magic? Magic is a very, very good player, and unguardable as an A- inside PG, but he is also top 15 in TO's per game.... Title: Re: Magic Post by: KingsGM-old on October 06, 2006, 08:11:35 AM Magic has more apg, less tpg's and better % from the field. There's the diference.
Title: Re: Magic Post by: CelticsGM on October 06, 2006, 08:19:31 AM Never liked Mercer. He was like Steve Francis, i would rather keep him on the bench. He haven't improved a single team. Shoot first pg with alots of turnovers. Can't get worst. I know, we could guess from your comment. But keep in mind that this is the ROOKIE SEASON only we are talking about and that Magic is currently #3 in TOs behind Mercer and English. It's debateable if we shouldn't rate Milner ahead of Magic as well, since he posted pretty similar numbers apart from the scoring (and Milner too only was #3 offensive option in a couple of sims and mostly no option at all), but averaged just 2.2 TOs. :-) Title: Re: Magic Post by: GoldenStateGM on October 06, 2006, 08:22:08 AM Magic has more apg, less tpg's and better % from the field. There's the diference. Yes, yes... And Mercer had a high 3 pt percentage, more points, more steals, and even more blocks... Not the point. And I would still much rather have Magic... But... Accuse Mercer of being a shoot-first pg with alot of turnovers, but Magic is also a shoot first PG with alot of to's. Title: Re: Magic Post by: KingsGM-old on October 06, 2006, 08:42:09 AM Eh, as i said, if you're going to be a shoot first pg, at least do it in a quaility fashion. There's a diference between 7.9apg and 7.6, bewteen 50% from the floor and 46, between 4.1tpg and 3.3tpg. One could say there is not soo much diferences just looking at these numbers but i think they have alots of impact once they're translated into actual game.
Title: Re: Magic Post by: Str8westcoasta on October 06, 2006, 09:45:02 AM Nice!
Barton O'Connell with 9.1apg, most ever for a Rookie! Also, his FG% and FT% are far superior to anyone else on that list! Title: Re: Magic Post by: CelticsGM on October 06, 2006, 10:14:27 AM Ivan, stats depend on so many additional facts like game settings, team setup, teammmates, injuries, it's impossible to compare those.
Would we all like to have Magic now? you bet. Would we have drafted him #1 out of my list? Sure not, but depending on team need anywhere between #3 and #10 (with his size and name probably closer to #5). Should we all praise you for fucking up last season and getting Magic ? ..... :bods: Title: Re: Magic Post by: KingsGM-old on October 06, 2006, 10:20:04 AM Quote Should we all praise you for fucking up last season and getting Magic ? What that has to do with anything? This thread is about Magic, not about what have i done last season. Title: Re: Magic Post by: BucksGM on October 06, 2006, 12:06:18 PM I'd put Magic's season ahead of Mercer's.
At the same time, this is only Sim 6, so let's not get ahead of ourselves. Clearly there have been better rookies though. Title: Re: Magic Post by: KingsGM-old on October 06, 2006, 12:08:59 PM Oh, i'm not sayin there wasn't, don't get me wrong. I just wanted to see where he stands among all time greats when it comes to rookies.
Title: Re: Magic Post by: MagicGM on October 11, 2006, 09:07:01 AM best rookie or not, but I don't think he is on the way to win the ROY. He really is sick, depends on how you understand it.
Title: Re: Magic Post by: KingsGM-old on October 11, 2006, 09:11:57 AM Yeah, no ROY for him.
|