|
Title: Celtics-Sonics Trade - processed Post by: Anonymous on March 03, 2005, 03:08:34 PM Boston Trades:
Gary Payton 2007 2nd round pick Seattle Trades: Luke Ridnour Mikael Pietrus Robert Traylor Why for the Celts: The Celtics are a bit thin on the front court and Traylor will add a bit of depth when Raef goes down with the eventual injury. Ridnour is a young point who can hopefully contribute some meaningful minutes behind West. Pietrus adds defensive help to a team in desperate need. Title: Celtics-Sonics Trade - processed Post by: SonicsGM on March 03, 2005, 03:23:38 PM Sonics Agree:
I get rid of some contracts for a player who will help me compete in the playoffs this year. I should remain very competitive this season, with the ability to start anew next year. Title: Celtics-Sonics Trade - processed Post by: HornetsGM on March 03, 2005, 04:33:09 PM good trade for both teams I think.
Title: Celtics-Sonics Trade - processed Post by: LakersGM-old on March 03, 2005, 05:44:30 PM Thanks for doing it a SECOND TIME. Dealing a player we are discussing I mean. I mean dude. Seriously notify teams youre talking to about the player before you go and pull the trigger. I mean i recieved no pm or anything.
Title: Celtics-Sonics Trade - processed Post by: SonicsGM on March 03, 2005, 08:01:49 PM Quote from: LakersGM Thanks for doing it a SECOND TIME. Dealing a player we are discussing I mean. I mean dude. Seriously notify teams youre talking to about the player before you go and pull the trigger. I mean i recieved no pm or anything. Dude, chill. I told you that your offer wasn't enough, and you continued to offer the same thing. I also said that I was probably doing something else. No need to get snippy. Title: Celtics-Sonics Trade - processed Post by: RaptorsGM on March 03, 2005, 09:06:31 PM Hmm, I wonder what this does to the Celtics, losing their starting PG and all...
Hopefully it makes them worse :) Title: Celtics-Sonics Trade - processed Post by: LakersGM-old on March 03, 2005, 10:19:11 PM You never told me you were probably doing something else. Actually, you never answered my last pm. You deal without notifying, and thats unbelievably frustrating when youre talking about a player with someone and suddenly find out hes just been dealt. You did this to me twice and i remember raptors gm having the same problem. You HAVE to notify other gms when youre talking about a player and you want to deal them to another team. Not doing so just ruins trade credibility,
Title: Celtics-Sonics Trade - processed Post by: SonicsGM on March 03, 2005, 10:24:23 PM my message to you was short and sweet, "Nah, no thanks."
Title: Celtics-Sonics Trade - processed Post by: CavsGM on March 03, 2005, 10:37:47 PM Pretty even trade. Celtics get some young players for depth and the Sonics get a solid veteran PG.
Title: Celtics-Sonics Trade - processed Post by: LakersGM-old on March 03, 2005, 10:43:35 PM you are mistaken then, cuz the message was this,
If you can give up a pick along with them, I'll do it. My two players are better than your two. So a pick makes it even. Title: Celtics-Sonics Trade - processed Post by: NetsGM on March 04, 2005, 01:20:10 AM Lakers, deal with it.
He can do business in any manner he sees fit. Title: Celtics-Sonics Trade - processed Post by: SixersGM on March 04, 2005, 04:23:41 AM LOL
anyway, solid deal for both teams. |