|
Title: Quick draft analysis part 2 - Veterans Post by: CelticsGM on October 21, 2005, 05:57:51 PM Quick draft analysis part 2 - Veterans
Biggest improvements in TC: 1. PG Curtis Sura, Hornets +9.0 2. SF Chase Russell, Spurs +8.5 3. SG Dean Drew, Bulls +8.0 4. PG Eddie Uner, Spurs +8.0 5. SF Tim Thomas, Spurs +7.5 rounding out the top 10: Telfair, Blazers - Robertson, Grizz - Keogan (Nolan that is, not Vince), Mavs - Pietrus, Kings - McCracken, Clippers Interesting: only 2 guys over 30 made in into the top30 here: Tim Thomas and Chauncey Billups. Haslem, Gasol and Etan Thomas were the only others past 26 in the top30. Nine of the top30 guys had A pot, but 10 C pot and 2 even D pot (as of BEFORE the TC !!!) Biggest disappointments among vets: 1. PG Andy Miles, Knicks -9.0 2. C Zendon Hamiltorn, wolves -7.5 3. PG Alvin Schenk, Nuggets -7.5 4. ST Sheed Wallace, Rockets -6.5 5. PF Austin Croshere, Magic -6.0 rounding out the top10 are Shane Nesterovich, Pistons - Mason Mercer, Bulls - D-Miles, Warriors - Evan Lo, Cavs - A. Johnson, Lakers Lookign at big names, Miles is the big loser tonight dropping 4 of 5 categories (plus pot) while Mercer and Ferry dropped 3 each, the latter is now F pot !!! other noteables: Kidd's age finally seems to catch up, but young guys like Oscar Ferry and Terpening and Mercer had bad TC's too. From the top30 here 3 players had B pot, 11 had C and the rest had a D pot, so at least this follows expectations. All in all 157 people gained ratings and 161 players lost with 97 unchanged (or balanced out wins/losses). Pretty even statline. I'd consider this one of the more friendly TC's (although half of the GMs won't agree), especially for rookies. Next up: Winners and losers among teams ... Title: Quick draft analysis part 2 - Veterans Post by: ClippersGM-old on October 21, 2005, 06:09:00 PM Pretty good work there CelticsGM!
Yes indeed, McCracken had D potential (and still has it) though he had a great TC. I am looking forward to your analysis of teams. Title: Quick draft analysis part 2 - Veterans Post by: MavsGM on October 21, 2005, 06:18:45 PM Way to go. :tup:
Title: Quick draft analysis part 2 - Veterans Post by: BullsGM-old on October 21, 2005, 06:19:34 PM Nice work bud. Like I said, Drew was the only bright spot from my TC.
with C+, A offense, I expect no less than 20 ppg. I think he could possibly average 22 ppg next season Title: Quick draft analysis part 2 - Veterans Post by: BlazersGM on October 21, 2005, 10:55:25 PM whata about Webber, he actually improved despite being 35 :D
Title: Quick draft analysis part 2 - Veterans Post by: Anonymous on October 22, 2005, 12:56:06 AM Yes, Miles sucked *%^
I am unimpressed Title: Quick draft analysis part 2 - Veterans Post by: SixersGM on October 22, 2005, 04:15:52 AM Celts ur really good at this. Nice JOB!
Title: Quick draft analysis part 2 - Veterans Post by: KingsGM-old on October 22, 2005, 12:56:32 PM You may also look at Mavs Oscar Jeannette.
B- B- C A- with B potential. Not bad for 27th pick. And yeah, my comp selected 2nd rounder. B- outside, B- inside, B- defense. Idiot, he really thinks he'll see any minutes. :) Title: Quick draft analysis part 2 - Veterans Post by: MavsGM on October 22, 2005, 02:39:30 PM Jeannette only improves his outside by 1. Yea, I have to said he was a good pick at the bottom of the first round.
Title: Quick draft analysis part 2 - Veterans Post by: SpursGM-old on October 22, 2005, 04:44:11 PM Can't beleive you mean Tim Thomas (+1 outside)...I think you mean Etan Thomas (+1 inside, +1 reb).
Title: Quick draft analysis part 2 - Veterans Post by: CelticsGM on October 23, 2005, 05:14:52 PM Quote from: SpursGM Can't beleive you mean Tim Thomas (+1 outside)...I think you mean Etan Thomas (+1 inside, +1 reb). No, sorry Doug, you read that correctly ... While Etan had a nice TC as well - and you'll love his improvements - it was TIMMY who had a monster TC going one up in scoring and 2 up in defense. Not that his move from C to B- defense will strike fear into opponents now, but according to my formula thats enough to lift him into the top 5. Gotta love such absolutely meaningless stats ... :wink: Title: Quick draft analysis part 2 - Veterans Post by: BullsGM-old on October 23, 2005, 05:15:44 PM Quote from: BullsGM with C+, A offense, I expect no less than 20 ppg. I think he could possibly average 22 ppg next season So far I'm bang on :) Title: Quick draft analysis part 2 - Veterans Post by: CavsGM on October 23, 2005, 06:01:12 PM Quote While Etan had a nice TC as well - and you'll love his improvements - it was TIMMY who had a monster TC going one up in scoring and 2 up in defense. Not that his move from C to B- defense will strike fear into opponents now, but according to my formula thats enough to lift him into the top 5. Tim Thomas pre-training camp: C+ B C- B- C B Tim Thomas post-training camp: C+ B+ C- B- C C ??? Title: Quick draft analysis part 2 - Veterans Post by: CelticsGM on October 24, 2005, 05:52:36 AM Quote from: CavsGM Quote While Etan had a nice TC as well - and you'll love his improvements - it was TIMMY who had a monster TC going one up in scoring and 2 up in defense. Not that his move from C to B- defense will strike fear into opponents now, but according to my formula thats enough to lift him into the top 5. Tim Thomas pre-training camp: C+ B C- B- C B Tim Thomas post-training camp: C+ B+ C- B- C C ??? Here's the solution: He was listed PF right before TC and he's just C defensively there. well, i can't check ANYTHING ... :lol: |