SSBA

Archive => Processed Trades => Topic started by: SpursGM-old on October 13, 2005, 02:38:54 PM



Title: Spurs - Nuggets deal
Post by: SpursGM-old on October 13, 2005, 02:38:54 PM
Spurs trade:
Alphonse Butler

Nuggets trade:
Eddie Uner
Hawks 2010 2nd



Spurs agree.


Title: Spurs - Nuggets deal
Post by: OldNuggetsGM on October 13, 2005, 02:57:14 PM
Denver agrees.

Uner is easily replaceable, and there isn't anybody left who I was dying to get my hands on.  There are still some intriguing guys, but no one who will help me.  

And I don't think Butler's that much different than Shultz (other than the inside game), so I obviously like the guy.  But please, someone help me understand how Shultz (http://ssba.phillyarena.net/files/draft/players/player1910.htm) is a B defensively, while Butler has near identical ratings (http://ssba.phillyarena.net/files/draft/players/player2510.htm) but is two positions lower at C+.


Title: Spurs - Nuggets deal
Post by: HawksGM on October 13, 2005, 03:32:25 PM
I like this for the Nuggets, Butler could be a good SG pretty soon


Title: Spurs - Nuggets deal
Post by: NetsGM on October 13, 2005, 08:46:11 PM
surprised everyone's talking about the nuggets, I think this could be a good trade for the Spurs.  I like Uner.


Title: Spurs - Nuggets deal
Post by: MagicGM on October 14, 2005, 05:56:10 AM
Butler looks good. :D


Title: Spurs - Nuggets deal
Post by: CelticsGM on October 14, 2005, 07:03:33 AM
Quote from: NuggetsGM
Denver agrees.

Uner is easily replaceable, and there isn't anybody left who I was dying to get my hands on.  There are still some intriguing guys, but no one who will help me.  

And I don't think Butler's that much different than Shultz (other than the inside game), so I obviously like the guy.  But please, someone help me understand how Shultz (http://ssba.phillyarena.net/files/draft/players/player1910.htm) is a B defensively, while Butler has near identical ratings (http://ssba.phillyarena.net/files/draft/players/player2510.htm) but is two positions lower at C+.

Hard to tell, both don't stop anybody with better opponents shooting up to 60%, but I could imagine that Shultz, being the vastly superior offensive thread, causes opponents to spend more energy on their defense thus having left less offensively. And all of a sudden Shultz looks decent on defense.

But i could be totally wrong here too ...
 8)