Title: With the 10th Pick Post by: NetsGM on July 06, 2005, 10:01:55 PM The Pistons select:
Shane Nesterovich, PF, South Florida. Title: With the 10th Pick Post by: NetsGM on July 06, 2005, 10:07:13 PM Man, if this guy could rebound, he'd be a top 3 pick. Interesting that he goes to a frontcourt with another weak rebounder (Ferry) getting 32+ mpg.
Title: With the 10th Pick Post by: CavsGM on July 06, 2005, 10:07:40 PM A steal, I think. Arguably the best PF in the draft. But the better potentials of Boykins and Strong led to Nesterovich falling to this spot...
Title: With the 10th Pick Post by: NetsGM on July 06, 2005, 10:08:49 PM I still think that had he been able to rebound he'd have gone to the hawks.
Title: With the 10th Pick Post by: CavsGM on July 06, 2005, 10:45:08 PM So I have that 11th pick. Hmm, who to pick, who to pick. Axtually, it's easy. Ward is definitely the best player still out there. It's a tougher decision, however, on which two to put on my sheet for the 13th pick. Oh yeah, still have that 18th pick...
Title: With the 10th Pick Post by: RaptorsGM on July 06, 2005, 11:31:58 PM My sheet is now in, and I'm excitied to see who I can get. There are 2 guys who I really, really want, and Ward is not one of them, so I hope they don't go 12-15.
Title: With the 10th Pick Post by: GoldenStateGM on July 07, 2005, 08:34:11 AM Great pick.
Nestervich is a very good player. And he has the skills to play some SF, where his rebounding will not be a detriment. In fact, with Ferry and Gasol entrenched as starters in the frontcourt, I would expect to see Shane starting at SF, depending upon how free agency turns out. Title: With the 10th Pick Post by: NetsGM on July 07, 2005, 08:54:20 AM yeah, I hadn't really thought about that. At only 221 lbs I guess it's feasible. Although, IMO, C+ outside scoring for a PF was his biggest strength.
Title: With the 10th Pick Post by: GoldenStateGM on July 07, 2005, 09:06:15 AM Quote from: NetsGM yeah, I hadn't really thought about that. At only 221 lbs I guess it's feasible. Although, IMO, C+ outside scoring for a PF was his biggest strength. True... and B, C+ is not great for a small forward, but not too shabby. And the C rebounding is average to above average for a small forward. The smallest offensive increase makes him a very, very good offensive player. Interestingly, the Pistons now have Gasol (C- out), Ferry (C out), and now Nesterovich (C+ out). Don't send these guys to the line, they will really sink their free throws... Title: With the 10th Pick Post by: PacersGM on July 07, 2005, 09:09:30 AM i do expect another trade for the pistons. i can´t imagine how they will share the ball with all the inside options.
Title: With the 10th Pick Post by: GoldenStateGM on July 07, 2005, 09:16:52 AM Quote from: PacersGM i do expect another trade for the pistons. i can´t imagine how they will share the ball with all the inside options. They do not have to share :) Ferry, Gasol, and Nash are the 3 top options. Ferry and Gasol are good for 20-25 ppg each, and Nash is good for 12-14 ppg. Nesterovich is a very nice non-option, either at SF or off the bench. And with that 11 million in cap space, they could be in very good shape, if anyone takes the money... Title: With the 10th Pick Post by: Iverson2Korver43 on July 07, 2005, 04:11:40 PM Very happy with the pick... Not considering the potential, he had the highest overall ratings of any of this years rooks...
Title: With the 10th Pick Post by: CavsGM on July 07, 2005, 07:18:56 PM Quote from: PistonsGM Very happy with the pick... Not considering the potential, he had the highest overall ratings of any of this years rooks... I think that would be Schabinger. Shane is tied for 2nd along with Gatling and Ward. Title: With the 10th Pick Post by: CavsGM on July 07, 2005, 08:22:33 PM So my own call for a sleeper pick, Garret Ward, is still available for me to pick up. Well, it's a done deal. GW is now a Cavalier. I'm excited about him. With his B potential, he could end up being a great point guard. As of now he will just be a backup, unless Miller is traded, of course.
|